Copyright Law & Startup Innovation: Policies That Matter and Where They May be Headed

  • Fair use and interoperability: Some big companies would like to expand the universe of what software is protected by copyright and which development activities constitute infringement. If that happened, it would prevent startups from using fundamental software development tools, expose them to new litigation risks, and make it harder to launch and compete. But after a decade of litigation, the Supreme Court recently confirmed that developers can use software interfaces — known as application programming interfaces (APIs) — without infringing copyright. The Court held that reimplementing APIs, which creates interoperability and compatibility between computer programs, is a fair use under copyright law.
  • Intermediary liability and the ability to host user-generated content: Scores of startups engage with user content — helping artists connect with fans, providing e-commerce platforms, hosting podcasts, or offering basic Internet infrastructure. These companies, and the creators and small businesses that depend on the Internet, interact with the copyright system every day. And they rely on balanced laws that allow the startups to resolve allegations of infringement without scrutinizing every post, upload, and comment for potential copyright violations. Some countries have started to replace those laws, instead moving to complex and expensive regimes that would force Internet companies to purchase expensive and imperfect upload filters, remove more non-infringing content, and negotiate licenses with big organizations that own a lot of copyrights. That is all do-able for big Internet platforms, but it will put startups at a substantial disadvantage. Yet similar ideas are being floated in the U.S. — where policymakers have proposed changes to copyright law (and trademark law).
  • Ancillary copyright and link taxes: Countries around the world have adopted or considered new copyright-like laws that would require websites to pay licensing fees or face lawsuits whenever they — or their users — link to a news article or quote the headline. These proposals, positioned as a solution to problems facing local media, have so far failed to deliver those benefits, but they carry substantial unintended consequences. Linking to news articles is something many startups and innovators — from media to edtech — rely on. But engaging with information and current events, which is central to public discourse and free speech, requires being able to link to and quote the news. Using copyright-like law to restrict that engagement would hinder innovation and the creation and exchange of ideas online.
  • Intersection of copyright and artificial intelligence: Startups and other companies developing AI technology have to input a lot of data into their systems, ingesting content to train, tune, and test new AI. As countries around the world review how intellectual property law applies to emerging AI, some are asking how copyright law should account for this ingesting of information, data, and content. But redefining copyright infringement to cover these uses of content to train AI could substantially hamper innovation.
  • Copyright Office modernization and regulatory capture: The U.S. Copyright Office is in a multi-year modernization process to update IT systems and processes that have been lagging. That must remain a priority, as startups and the broader public need an improved, user-friendly database that allows them to search for copyrighted works and find owners and licensees. Without that type of information, avoiding infringement is like walking through a minefield in a blindfold. But the agency is also subject to regulatory capture — exhibiting bias in favor of certain copyright holders (particularly large corporate interests) and away from the public’s interest. In thinking about modernization, policymakers should look to bring more balance to the system, perhaps through positive influence from the Library of Congress.

--

--

--

Engine is the voice of startups in government. We are a nonprofit that supports entrepreneurship through economic research, policy analysis, and advocacy.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

How AI Solutions are being leveraged by Insurtech Companies

Top Google Community for Everyone

Impact of Machine learning on the Growth of Industries

The journey begins — Artificial Intelligence

Positive Use Cases of Deepfakes

deepfake can can power personalized assistive navigation apps for pedestrian travel

Investing Post AI (Part 3): Empowering Creativity

A Perspective On The Relevance Of Claims Management In Insurance

Asymmetric Warfare Technology

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Engine

Engine

Engine is the voice of startups in government. We are a nonprofit that supports entrepreneurship through economic research, policy analysis, and advocacy.

More from Medium

Engine@10: A Decade of Pro-Startup Policy Work

Social Media’s Domino Effect

Why Losing Hurts us more than Winning

Why Doing Less is the Secret for Consultants Looking to Flourish on Social Media!